¹（鲁东大学学生工作部 烟台 264025）
²（鲁东大学管理学院 烟台 264025）
³（中国农业大学信息与电气工程学院 北京 100083）
⁴（鲁东大学图书馆 烟台 264025）

知识表示与匹配推理是语义知识管理的中心环节。为实现文献供应链知识的语义管理，提出文献供应链知识本体模型，以及资源描述框架（RDF）与改进的Voronoi图形式化表示方法；建立了基于RDF形式化表示的定性推理与在此基础上基于改进的Voronoi图形式化表示的定量推理。实验显示，基于形式化表示的推理规则与算法在文献供应链管理中得到合理的结果验证。

¹(Department of Student Work，Ludong University, Yantai 264025, China)
²(College of Management, Ludong University, Yantai 264025,China)
³(College of Information and Electrical Engineering, China Agricultural University,Beijing 100083,China)
⁴(Ludong University Library, Yantai 264025,China)

Knowledge representation and matching-reasoning are two key steps for a semantic knowledge management system. In order to realize the semantic management of literatures supply chain knowledge, the authors put forward the literatures supply chain knowledge Ontology model and formalize the model using RDF (Resource Description Framework) and advanced Voronoi diagram. The authors setup the qualitative reasoning rules based on the RDF formalized model and put forward the quantitative reasoning arithmetic based on the advanced Voronoi diagram formalized model. The experiments show the reasoning rules and arithmetic based on the formalized model could get rational results in literatures supply chain knowledge management.

TP393

［1］ 唐卫宁，徐福缘.基于本体和语义Web服务的供应链知识集成［J］.计算机工程，2006(12)：167-169. 
［2］ 田方斌.基于图书供应链的营销渠道管理［J］.图书情报知识，2004(2)：88-90.
［3］ Neches R, Fikes R E, Gruber T R, et al. Enabling Technology for Knowledge Sharing［J］. AI Magazine, 1991, 12(3): 36-56.
［4］ Studer R, Benjamins V R, Fensel D. Knowledge Engineering, Principles and Methods［J］. Data and Knowledge Engineering, 1998, 25(122): 161-197.
［5］ Lenat D, Guha R V. Building Large Knowledge-based Systems: Representation and Inference in the CYC Project［M］.Addison-Wesley， 1990.
［6］ Gruninger M, Fox M S. The Logic of Enterprise Modelling［M］. In:J Brown, D O’Sullivan, Editors, Reengineering the Enterprise, 1995.
［7］ Uschold M, King M, Moralee S, et al. The Enterprise Ontology［J］. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 1998,13(1):31-89.
［8］ Schreiber G, Wielinga B, Jansweijer W. The Kactus View on the ‘o’ word［M］. Workshop on Basic Ontological Issues in Knowledge Sharing: International Joint Conference on Aritificial Intelligence, 1995.
［9］ LiJun Zhu, Lan Tao, Hui Liu. Calculation of the Concept Similarity in Domain Ontology［J］. Journal of South China University of Technology. 2004(32):147-150.
［10］ Budanisky A, Hirst G. Semantic Distance in WordNet:An Experimental,Application-oriented Evaluation of Five Measures［C］.In:Workshop on WordNet and Other Lexical Resources,Second Meeting of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Pittsburgh, USA,2001.
［11］ Genest D, Chein M. An Experiment in Document Retrieval Using Conceptual Graphs. Conceptual structures: Fulfilling Peirce’s Dream［R］. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence. August, 1997:1257.
［12］ Myaeng, Sung H. Conceptual Graph Matching as a Plausible Inference Technique for Text Retrieval［C］. In:Proc. of the 5th Conceptual Structures Workshop, Held in Conjunction with AAAI-90, Bosto, 1990.